| Daily News Brief May 5, 2014 |
Help the Daily News Brief better serve you.
Please answer a brief survey.
|
Top of the Agenda
Violence in Odessa Latest Blow to Kiev’s Authority
Kiev's authority over eastern Ukraine appeared increasingly tenuous on Sunday
after a mob stormed a police station in Odessa and freed sixty-seven
pro-Russian militants from detention. The events overshadowed interim
prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk's visit to the Black Sea port city,
where he had arrived to express condolences for the dozens killed in
street fighting and a fire that engulfed a trade union building on Friday, and instead cast blame on the local police (WaPo). The U.S. ambassador to Ukraine called for an investigation into Friday's violence, saying there was no evidence of direct links to the Kremlin while alleging Moscow's influence (WSJ).
Ukraine, meanwhile, is struggling to break free from the Russian
state-owned firm Gazprom's grip over natural gas in dealing with
Slovakia—a technically simple but politically fraught arrangement (NYT).
Analysis
"It's
easy to understand why Putin would covet and wish to annex Odessa and
other southeast Ukrainian cities, but calling them Russian cities evokes
a history that never was. In the 1920s, when Vladimir Lenin made the
region officially a part of Ukraine and granted the Ukrainian Socialist
Republic a veneer of autonomy, he said he was doing so 'to avoid Great Russian imperialism and chauvinism.' Vladimir Putin clearly sees nothing wrong with these traits," wries Patricia Herlihy in the Los Angeles Times.
"We
call this phenomenon the unbalanced globalization of oil-rich states.
It matters because it leaves the world with a set of countries on which
most others countries are highly dependent but who are not well
integrated into the world's political and legal institutional
infrastructure. This underscores the complex dilemma that Obama faces
in imposing costs on Russia. How can you penalize a government that
sits on top of such extraordinary wealth – and can prosper while
thumbing its nose at international institutions?" write Michael Ross and
Erik Voeten for the Monkey Cage.
"Each
situation is different, but in the echo-chamber of global politics they
reinforce each other. The Asians note that in 1994, in exchange for
surrendering nuclear weapons, Ukraine received a guarantee from Russia,
America and Britain that its borders were safe. The Baltic countries
remember the red lines crossed in Syria. Arab princes and Chinese
ambassadors count the Republican senators embracing isolationism.
Together, these retreats plant a nagging suspicion among friends and foes that on the big day America simply might not turn up," writes the Economist.
No comments:
Post a Comment