Five years ago, Robert D. Kaplan detailed the promise and the peril of this vital part of the globe. Will it be a source of tension or trust in the 21st century?
In 2009, emblazoned in large red letters on the cover of Foreign Affairs
were the words “Rivalry in the Indian Ocean.” In this featured article,
Robert D. Kaplan announced to the Western world the growing importance
of a long-neglected geographic entity in the study of international
politics. His essay,
“Center Stage for the 21st Century: Power Plays in the Indian Ocean”
continues to be cited in countless articles and paved the way for his
2010 book, Monsoon.
Kaplan’s contribution was to explain the civilizational and political
connections of disparate Asian, African and Middle Eastern players in
the Indian Ocean. Although Robert Kaplan’s recent work
examines the South China Sea, his influential 2009 article on
Chinese-Indian competition in the Indian Ocean and U.S. interests in the
region deserves to be revisited on its five-year anniversary.
In
2009, Kaplan saw energy security and geopolitics converging in the
Indian Ocean. Because roughly two-thirds of petroleum traffic traverses
this body of water, it will become increasingly important to numerous
stakeholders, whose interests and infrastructure projects he detailed.
Other than the United States, the countries commanding most of Kaplan’s
attention were India and China. Given their size and growing dependence
on the sea lanes for energy supplies and trade, Kaplan saw an inevitable
geopolitical “great game” rivalry emerging in the Indian Ocean. As a
solution, he argued that the United States should “act as a broker” to
mitigate the likelihood of conflict between these two rising economic
and military powerhouses, even though he foresaw the superpower as
experiencing an unavoidable “elegant decline.”
The Indian Ocean: A Great-Power Danger Zone? | The National Interest
No comments:
Post a Comment