U.S. Security Agreements and Iraq
http://www.cfr.org/publication/16448/us_security_agreements_and_iraq.html?breadcrumb=%2F
Reflections from news and commentary of the day
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Posts
Comments
Reflections from news and commentary of the day
Posts
Comments
8 comments:
Backgrounder: U.S. Security Agreements and Iraq
http://www.nytimes.com/cfr/world/slot1_20080604.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
SOFA Update
http://abumuqawama.blogspot.com/2008/06/sofa-update.html
Senior official confident of US-Iraq deal in July
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/10/AR2008061000183.html
Iraqis Condemn American Demands
Sides Negotiating U.S. Military Role
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/10/AR2008061003415.html
Target date of July for completion of Iraq-US Troop Deal
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/target_date_of_july_for_comple.html
Having Your Cake and
Eating It Too
http://www.antiwar.com/pena/?articleid=12968
US Security Talks With Iraq in Trouble in Baghdad and DC
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/40549.html
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
US Seeking 58 Bases;
Khamenei Tells al-Maliki not to sign Security Pact
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki met Monday with Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
According to Farsnews writing in Persian, Khamenei told al-Maliki that the most important and fundamental problem for Iraq at present is the presence of Occupation forces. He affirmed, "We are certain that the people of Iraq, through their intrinsic unity and effort, will cross over these difficult conditions and arrive at a place befitting them. The dream of the Americans most certainly will never be realized." He emphasized that the Islamic Republic of Iran considers helping the government and people of Iraq a religious duty. He expressed the hope that al-Maliki's visit to Iran and the agreements he signed there would strengthen relations between the two countries.
Al-Maliki expressed his conviction that Iraqis were attaining a consensus and beginning to speak with a single voice. Khamenei expressed his concern that the Americans would interfere illegitimately and "impudently" in Iraqi affairs and disrupt this building consensus. He compared the current role of the US with the one the British used to play in promoting divide and rule policies even in independent Iraq after 1932. He also expressed his worry that the US would worm itself into every aspect of Iraq's affairs.
Al-Hayat writes Tuesday morning in Arabic that Khamenei advised al-Maliki not to sign any such security agreement.
Leila Fadel reports that Shiite lawmakers in Iraq told her that the US has requested 58 bases from the Iraqi government as part of the security agreement now being negotiated. The US also is said to want the authority to decide when Iraq has been attacked, and when and how to respond. The lawmakers are afraid that Washington will use that provision to drag them into the middle of a war between the US and Iran.
On being informed by McClatchy of some of these details, the campaign of Senator Barack Obama demanded that any such stipulation of 58 bases be submitted to the US Congress for approval, and that the Iraqis be told that the US does not seek permanent bases in that country. The McCain campaign had no comment.
Al-Hayat reports that Kurdish MP Mahmud Osman is saying that he has seen a second version of the agreement in which the Americans reduced their demands.
posted by Juan Cole @ 6/10/2008 06:38:00 AM
http://www.juancole.com/
Post a Comment