The Two-State Solution Is Dead
07/12/14
Flynt Leverett , Hillary Mann Leverett
Security, Israel, Palestinian territories
"Given the deeply counterproductive results of America’s Middle East strategy over the last quarter century, one may hope that Washington will finally stop making policy in defiance of on-the-ground reality."
Secretary
of State John Kerry’s failed efforts to broker an Israeli-Palestinian
“final status” deal highlight American foreign policy elites’
instrumental attachment to a negotiated “two-state” solution as the only
acceptable basis for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza, though, underscores a fundamentally
different reality: the two-state solution is dead. And no matter how
much Israel and its supporters object, the reigning paradigm for
addressing the conflict is shifting ineluctably from a two-state model
to a one-state model.
The
two-state solution is the illusory end product of a U.S.-conceived
“peace process” that has always been about things other than actually
achieving peace—just as, contrary to the conventional trope, the
U.S.-Israeli “special relationship” is not really about “shared values.”
From
Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948 to 1967—when memories of
the Holocaust were fresh and Israel was arguably at its most
democratic—America provided it no appreciable military or economic
assistance; indeed, Washington barely gave it food aid. During the same
period, there was plenty of fighting between Israel and various Arab
parties—yet America did not initiate any kind of “peace process.”
Washington
only began providing substantial military and economic assistance to
Israel after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, when Israel showed itself
capable of unilaterally defeating and seizing territory from Arab states
allied with Moscow. From Washington’s perspective, supporting an
Israeli military that would periodically show up Soviet-supplied Arab
opponents was, in a Cold War context, strategically valuable. After the
Cold War’s end, U.S. policymakers continued calculating that
U.S.-facilitated Israeli military superiority helped keep the region
subordinated.
Likewise,
Washington only launched a “peace process” after 1967, to elicit Arab
states’ buy-in for what were going to be ever-increasing flows of U.S.
weapons and money to Israel’s military. The process was never meant to
constrain Israel and help Palestinians exercise their right to
self-determination as part of genuine conflict resolution; it has always
been about empowering Israel and subordinating Palestinians and other
Arabs as part of an increasingly militarized U.S. sphere of influence in
the Middle East.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-two-state-solution-dead-10862
No comments:
Post a Comment