America’s Hollow Foreign-Policy Debate
07/10/14
Tom Nichols
Grand Strategy, Foreign Policy, Politics, United States
"Our insular arm wrestling has made us helpless bystanders, watching a string of foreign-policy defeats, the likes of which we have not experienced since the 1970s."
The
use of military force is among the most wrenching decisions a democracy
ever faces. Placing America’s sons and daughters in harm’s way in the
name of our national goals requires discussions of the utmost
seriousness and solemnity. And that’s why it’s a shame—and a terrible
danger—that our national debates on intervention and the use of force
have become exercises in mendacity and partisanship, characterized at
their core by a desolate moral hollowness.
The
disingenuousness of all sides when it comes to the exercise of American
power is disheartening, even shocking. People who once cheered the
immense risks of marching on Baghdad now pretend to cold-eyed pragmatism and caution. People who once denounced American warmongering now gleefully revel in the killing of terrorists. People who once decried the expansion of presidential power (including then-Senator Barack Obama)
now defend almost unlimited war-making prerogatives, while others who
once would brook no boundaries on the discretion of the executive have
now found a new fascination with the War Powers Resolution
and the role of Congress. The words “national interest,” once a source
of legitimate and intelligent debate, no longer have content and are now
used to denote things of which the speaker does, or does not, happen to
approve.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/feature/america%E2%80%99s-hollow-foreign-policy-debate-10839
No comments:
Post a Comment