The Bias for Action in U.S. Foreign Policy
06/26/14
Paul R. Pillar
United States Iraq, Middle East
A
“bias for action” has long been a buzz phrase in the business world.
Tom Peters and Robert Waterman in their best-selling book In Search of Excellence
put the phrase at the top of their list of attributes of what they
considered to be outstanding firms. For an individual hoping to make it
big in business, it's not a bad phrase to keep in mind. Ambitious
executives do not make names for themselves by saying they will take
whatever organization they are responsible for and try not to screw it
up. They make names by shaking things up. Moreover, the businesses with
the most dramatic and admired garage-startup-to-behemoth histories
necessarily had a bias for action.
Even
in business, however, the behavior implied by the phrase has
limitations. What is good for the rising career of an individual
executive is not necessarily good for the firm. And for every Apple or
Amazon we have heard about, there are many more companies we have not
heard about in which the leader's bias for action led to unprofitable
business lines, financial overextension, or other failures that caused
the firm to crash and burn.
Applied
to foreign policy, the soundness of behavior implied by a bias for
action is even more questionable. Perhaps it is most valid when trying
to build an empire. Otto von Bismarck, for example, had a bias for
action when using wars against other European states as a means for
putting together the German Empire. But for most states at most times,
that is not the case. It is not the case for the United States today.
The United States has a responsibility, to itself as well as to world
order, less to build a bigger empire than to avoid screwing things up.
And when the United States screws up, things can get very bad, not only
because as the world's only superpower it is more powerful than anyone
else but also because with global involvement it has a lot of
vulnerabilities that other states do not have. Crashing and burning is
not an option.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/the-bias-action-us-foreign-policy-10764
No comments:
Post a Comment