09/01/14
Nikolas K. Gvosdev
Security, Ukraine, Russia
"We
have a tendency to be puzzled by Russian actions and can attribute it
to an inscrutable Kremlin mindset, when, in actuality, Moscow is
aligning its strategic compass to a different set of goals."
The
initial optimism that the first face-to-face meeting between the
presidents of Russia and Ukraine last week in Minsk represented the
long-awaited start to the de-escalation of Europe’s worst security
crisis in a generation was dashed when, contrary to expectations, the
fighting in East Ukraine accelerated—and Moscow began to more openly
assist the separatist forces. This begs the question: when a very
promising off-ramp to defusing tensions presented itself, why would
Vladimir Putin seemingly reject it?
Pundits
have come up with all sorts of explanations—from irrationality to
megalomania to outright duplicity—and the overall impression many are
left with is that Putin is hell-bent on war.
Yet
one can detect a very clear purpose and design behind Russian
actions—particularly in simultaneously starting dialogue and encouraging
an increase in the tempo of military operations in southeastern
Ukraine, following a template that has already been used vis-à-vis
Georgia six years ago. We have a tendency to be puzzled by Russian
actions and can attribute it to an inscrutable Kremlin mindset, when, in
actuality, Moscow is aligning its strategic compass to a different set
of goals.
Going
forward, there are three objectives to be obtained—first, to weaken the
bargaining position of the Ukrainian government and to move it towards
acceptance of Russian proposals; the second, to destroy or degrade its
military and economic capabilities, and the third, and perhaps most
important, is to discredit Western promises of aid and support and, if
possible, induce a feeling of betrayal and abandonment among Ukraine’s
leaders.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/feature/putins-goal-ukraine-11170 |
No comments:
Post a Comment