Top of the Agenda
Security Council Moves Against Foreign Terror Fighters
Analysis
"How
realistic, really, is the vision of a broad multilateral conference
among regional powers (presumably including Russia and Iran as well as
Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, and Israel) to resolve
differences over Syria? The administration, of course, is already
grappling with these questions—and hopefully will deliver convincing
answers to them after the bilateral meetings this week. For now,
however, Obama has delivered the right –and crucial—message to his fellow delegates at the United Nations," writes CFR's Stewart Patrick.
"The Security Council should take on the growing foreign-fighter threat. But, as Mr. Obama acknowledged, adherence to the rule of law and human rights must be part of any counterterrorism strategy. Anything less would end up fueling more violent extremism," writes the New York Times.
"What
the world hears Obama saying is that the U.S. will use force to avenge
the deaths of two American journalists, but will stand by while 200,000
Syrians are slaughtered. Unless U.S. military action is seen as actually protecting the lives and property
of the Iraqi and Syrian people, the U.S. will quickly lose the
propaganda war to the Islamic state," writes Anne-Marie Slaughter in Project Syndicate.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment