Apr 29, 2014 02:00 am | Nikolas K. Gvosdev
In
March 1992, as war loomed on the horizon, the various factions met in
Lisbon to try and craft a deal that would hold Bosnia together and avert
the predictable tragedy. Reluctantly, the country's Muslims, Croats and
Serbs grappled with the creation of a decentralized country in which
each ethnic group would have predominance in different cantons, bound
together in a loose federation. At the last minute, the agreement was
torpedoed. Many asserted that the president of Bosnia, Alija
Izetbegovic, whose own authority (and that of the Muslim community over
all of Bosnia) would have been diminished by the accord, had rejected
it, having supposedly received assurances from the Americans (who did
not like the overt partition of Bosnia on ethnic lines) that Washington
would support the Bosnian government in the event of war. Three years
later, after a brutal and devastating conflict in which the Bosnian
government was dealt a series of devastating blows, a U.S.-sponsored peace agreement at Dayton ratified the division of Bosnia into distinct ethnic entities.read morehttp://nationalinterest.org/commentary/does-america-have-ukraines-back-10358
No comments:
Post a Comment