Daily News Brief September 4, 2013 |
Top of the Agenda: Putin Warns West on Syrian Action
President Vladimir Putin warned the West against going through with a punitive strike against the Assad regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons (AP),
and said Moscow would reconsider its decision to suspend delivery of an
air-defense missile system to Syria if military action is taken without
UN Security Council authorization. The Obama administration edged
closer to congressional authorization for the use of force on Tuesday after a long and sometimes testy hearing in the Senate, where the foreign relations committee's draft resolution would permit sixty days of military operations (Miami Herald), which the president could then extend for an additional thirty. Uncertainty over a potential strike and fallout dragged on many equity markets (Reuters) despite a positive outlook for the global economy.
Analysis
"The US should reverse course. A direct US attack on Syria without UN backing is far more likely to inflame the region than it is to resolve the crisis there—a
point well appreciated in the United Kingdom, where Parliament bucked
the government by rejecting British participation in a military strike,"
writes Jeffrey Sachs for Project Syndicate.
"Ratification
of an AUMF for Syria might set a precedent for Congress as much as for
Obama. It would suggest that Congress agrees that the United States should enforce international norms
against the use of dangerous weapons or intervene to prevent serious
violations of human rights—even when the United Nations will not lend
its support," writes Jack Balkin in the Atlantic.
"If
the world's strongest power fails to defend the hard-earned prohibition
against the use of chemical weapons, then don't expect anyone else to,
either. The best move now is for Obama to muster every gram of
persuasion, focus his nation's and the world's attention on the global
need to prevent these weapons from being used and, yet again, build a coalition of the willing," Bloomberg editors write in an editorial.
No comments:
Post a Comment