Pages

Search This Blog

Saturday, December 29, 2012

Some pro-Hagel newspaper editorials from around the nation

---
Here's a preliminary list... not comprehensive, but a good cross-section from around the nation...

Local Papers Support Hagel in the Face of Inside-The-Beltway Neocon Opposition

 

Hagel a good fit for next Secretary of Defense

The Independent, Grand Island, NE (Dec 28, 2012)

He is independent and party loyalists struggle with that concept. Hagel is committed to a strong America, regardless of what the party policy wonks spew. Frankly it is refreshing to think the president will have an independent, objective, experienced voice such as Chuck Hagel’s at the Cabinet conference table.

http://www.theindependent.com/opinion/editorial/hagel-a-good-fit-for-next-secretary-of-defense/article_ddbe9456-5076-11e2-b0df-0019bb2963f4.html

 

 

Veterans Denounce Neoconservative 'Swiftboating' of Chuck Hagel

Express Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI (Dec 28 2012)

By Joe Conason

He may run into problems among his former Republican Senate colleagues, not all of whom admire him, but their opinions should carry little weight. Indeed, their opposition too should serve to strengthen the case for Hagel's confirmation. He has served his country with courage and principle over many years in public service—which is far more than can be said for most of his adversaries.

http://expressmilwaukee.com/article-20392-veterans-denounce-neoconservative-%5C%27swiftboating%5C%27-of-chuck-hagel.html

 

Editorial: Give Hagel a shot at Defense

MetroWest Daily News, Framingham, MA  (Dec 28, 2012)
In his first term, Obama showed a preference for strong, independent individuals in his cabinet who aren’t afraid to give the president candid counsel. Hagel would bring that kind of attitude and stature to the Pentagon, and we’d like to see him have the chance.
http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinions/editorials/x1631897940/Editorial-Give-Hagel-a-shot-at-Defense#ixzz2GSIM90jY


Obama should ignore Republican attacks on defense candidate

The Gazette, Cedar Rapids, Iowa (Dec 28, 2012)
(Reprint from The Hawk Eye, Burlington, Iowa)
A rarity in his pragmatism and political moderation […] His views and credentials make him a good fit for the task ahead […] There is a difference between being anti-Israel and being Israel's pawn.  Chuck Hagel apparently thinks that's the way it should be. And most Americans, weary of Middle Eastern countries' blood-drenched squabbles, agree.


Editorial: Hagel excellent to run Pentagon; critics mistaken
Ventura County Star, Camarillo, CA (Dec 26, 2012)

Mr. Hagel's career in and out of politics has demonstrated integrity, knowledge, experience and credibility.  If President Obama bows to the right and backs down on Mr. Hagel, as he did when U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was targeted by the right and withdrew from consideration as secretary of state, he will only weaken his presidency. http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/dec/26/editorial-hagel-excellent-to-run-pentagon/#ixzz2GSNv49Zn 

 

 

Editorial: Hagel good choice for defense

Journal Star, Lincoln, NE (Dec 22, 2012)
One defining characteristic that Hagel would bring to the post of secretary of defense would be a clear-eyed realism about the role of the U.S. military. “It’s easy to get into war, not so easy to get out,” he wrote several years ago. Hagel would serve the nation well as secretary of defense.


Hagel's Israel litmus test

Times Union, Albany, NY (Dec 22, 2012)
(Reprint from LA Times)
Aaron David Miller, a scholar who advised Republican and Democratic administrations on Middle East issues, told The New York Times that "there should not be a litmus test of whether he is pro-Israel enough." We agree. If Obama is convinced that Hagel is the right candidate, he should nominate him — and let the Senate exercise its responsibility of advice and consent.


Obama should ignore Republican attacks on defense candidate
The Hawk Eye, Burlington, Iowa (Dec 22, 2012)
A rarity in his pragmatism and political moderation […] His views and credentials make him a good fit for the task ahead […] There is a difference between being anti-Israel and being Israel's pawn.  Chuck Hagel apparently thinks that's the way it should be. And most Americans, weary of Middle Eastern countries' blood-drenched squabbles, agree.


Editorial: Nominate Chuck Hagel for Defense Secretary
The Republic, Columbus, IN (Dec 22, 2012)
Hagel is that rarity these days: a moderate. He clashed repeatedly with former President George W. Bush over how the war in Iraq was conducted. He is a foreign policy realist who has spent years thinking about the role of the United States in the world.  As Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, noted in defending Hagel, the defense secretary doesn't make foreign policy -- he carries it out. And America's men and women in uniform would know that one of their own was leading the Pentagon.

The Hagel litmus test (Editorial)

LA Times (Dec 20, 2012)
Aaron David Miller, a scholar who advised Republican and Democratic administrations on Middle East issues, told the New York Times that "there should not be a litmus test of whether he is pro-Israel enough." We agree. If Obama is convinced that Hagel is the right candidate, he should nominate him — and let the Senate exercise its responsibility of advice and consent.

--
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
naiman@justforeignpolicy.org

No comments: