JOHN HUSSMAN: We Are Already In Recession, And The Economists Just Don't Know It Yet
In his latest weekly letter, investor John Hussman reiterates his belief that we are already in recession.
In regard to a U.S. recession, keep in mind
that the consensus of economic forecasters – not to mention central
bankers - has never recognized the start of a recession in real-time,
largely because their assessments typically revolve around a “stream of
anecdotes” approach that treats each new economic report with equal
weight, without distinguishing leading/lagging and upstream/downstream
structure. For example, we’ve noted that real consumption growth and
real income lead new factory orders, which lead employment. Yet
observers have already largely dismissed the soft data on income,
consumption and factory orders thanks to last week’s single outlier on
new weekly unemployment claims. As for the payroll report this Friday,
we fully expect that September payroll growth will ultimately be
reported as a significant loss in jobs. The main wrinkle, as I’ve noted
frequently, is that the “real-time” employment figures in the early
months of a recession are often hundreds of thousands of jobs off from
where they are ultimately revised (see the economic notes in Late Stage, High Risk).
So while Friday’s employment report seems likely to be disappointing,
the data tends to be heavily revised, and even the seasonal adjustments
amount to hundreds of thousands of jobs, so our expectations for a
negative figure may or may not be realized in the initial report.
Last week, the second quarter GDP growth
figure was revised down to 1.3%, from the previous estimate of 1.7%.
Durable goods orders plunged at a 13.2% rate in August, largely on
reduced transportation orders, but even ex-transportation, new orders
dropped at the sharpest rate since 2009. It is also notable that Gross
Domestic Income – the theoretically equal “income” companion of gross
domestic “production” – grew at an annual rate of just 0.1% in the
second quarter. The difference between GDI and GDP is nothing but a
statistical discrepancy, so the two series track each other very closely
over time despite short-term disparities. Because GDI has often led GDP
at recessionary turns, Alan Greenspan
was well-known for paying close attention to GDI – though not closely
enough to recognize that the economy was already in recession when he
was interviewed by Business Week in mid-2008, fully two-quarters after
that recession had actually begun.
The chart below presents the 6-quarter
growth of real gross domestic product (GDP) and real gross domestic
income (GDI) since 1950. A good look at this chart provides some insight
into why recession concerns have had a “Chicken Little” quality in
recent quarters. Note that by the time the 6-quarter growth in income
and production has slowed below 2.3% in the past, the economy was always
either approaching or already in recession. It’s also worth observing
the weakness in GDI growth approaching the 1990-91 and 2008-2009
recessions.
In the present instance, the 6-quarter
average of real GDI and GDP growth has been below 2.3% for nearly a
year, with no apparent recession, and in fact has bounced around that
threshold since 2010. The monetary interventions of the past few years
have helped to kick the recessionary can down the road in short-lived
fits and starts. Still, they certainly have not been effective in
producing sustained recovery (nor should they be expected to – being
largely a manipulation of financial markets with no reliable
transmission mechanism to the real economy).
The key question is whether the absence of
an obvious recession should be taken as an indication that the
deterioration in income and output growth can be ignored – in effect,
whether we should assume that this time is different. From our
standpoint, the evidence from a wide variety of economic series,
including but not limited to broad measures like GDI and GDP, continues
to indicate that the U.S. economy most likely entered a recession in the
middle of this year.
Read the whole Hussman letter here >
No comments:
Post a Comment