Failure and unintended
consequences: these are often hallmarks of U.S. military interventions. Who
could have imagined, for instance, that forcing open the Kingdom of Japan at the point of U.S. Navy guns
would eventually lead to bombs
falling on ships from that same navy at Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii? Or who could have foreseen
that attempting to tip the scales in favor of French colonial forces in Vietnam
in the 1950s would end in tripartite U.S. military failures in Vietnam,
Cambodia, and Laos in the 1970s? Or who could have known that arming Islamic
militants against the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s would lead to the 9/11
attacks and a never-ending Afghan War in the twenty-first century, or that a
quick, triumphant war against Iraq in 1990-1991 would morph into a debacle of an
invasion and occupation of Iraq 12 years later? At some point, however, it
should become clear that military interventions in distant lands have a strange
way of begetting disastrous consequences.
Take Libya. In 1986, President
Ronald Reagan launched air raidsagainst
Libya, including a failed “decapitation” strike against the country’s leader,
Colonel Moammar Gadhafi. In 2011, Gadhafi was still in power when President
Obama intervened in a civil war there. This time, Libyan rebels killed Gadhafi
and the U.S. celebrated a cleanvictory at little cost.
“Without putting a single U.S. service member on the ground, we achieved our
objectives,” President Obama said.
No comments:
Post a Comment