Top of the Agenda: State Department Reveals New Details of Benghazi Attack
U.S.
State Department officials will testify before a congressional panel
today on the events in Benghazi that led to the death of U.S. Ambassador
Christopher Stevens. Department officials on Tuesday offered their most
detailed description yet of the events in the Libyan city last month, backing away from earlier assertions (AP)
that the violence was triggered by protests against an anti-Islam video
that insulted the prophet Mohammed. Republicans have accused the State
Department of ignoring pleas from diplomats in Libya to increase
security in the months before the attack in Benghazi.
Analysis
"If the Benghazi tragedy
traces the same journey we made from the rubble in Nairobi, heartfelt
pronouncements will be made; the dead will be given due homage and then
they will be buried. The press will alight on other stories. A
Congressionally mandated accountability review board will determine what
happened and what needs to be done to avoid such tragedies in the
future. Easy fixes—changes to emergency action plans, minor security
upgrades—will be made; expensive and hard ones will not," writes
Prudence Bushnell for the New York Times.
"Ambassador
Stevens died a hero. Whether or not he took an unnecessary risk, he
knew he couldn't do his job while isolating himself from Libyans. The
same holds true for American spies. If the contagion in the Middle East
continues to spread, the one thing Americans can count on is going
blind — and it won't be the fault of U.S. intelligence or anyone in
Washington but just another sign of Americans' declining position in the
region," writes Robert Baer for TIME.
"The Obama administration may want to wait until after the election to respond, but each day of inaction makes him look weaker
to the American public and our allies and enemies abroad. Thursday, the
day Vice President Biden debates Paul Ryan, will mark one month since
the consulate attack. Obama won't be able to put off a response—or at
least an explanation for the delay—for much longer," writes Alana
Goodman for Commentary Magazine.
No comments:
Post a Comment