Posts
 Israeli drone crashes in northern GazaJerusalem (AFP) Oct 21, 2010 - An Israeli army drone crashed in the north of the Hamas-run Gaza Strip on Thursday but was recovered by a military unit, an army spokeswoman said. "The drone crashed in northern Gaza, at first reading from a technical fault," she told AFP. "A unit was sent to the scene and has recovered the machine." The military uses drones to feed back real-time pictures from the ground and detect rocket launches against Israel. Some of the drones are armed. Israel is the world's leading exporter of drones for military and security use, with more than 1,000 sold in 42 countries, earning about 350 million dollars each year. |
London (AFP) Oct 21, 2010 The US programme of drone strikes targeting Islamist militants in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries violates international law and should be halted, a legal expert warned Thursday. Mary Ellen O'Connell, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, told a debate at a leading London think-tank that the pursuit of Al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists should be a law enforcement issue, not a military one.
"The strongest conclusion is that there is no legal right to resort to drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere where the US is not involved in armed conflict," she told the respected Chatham House centre.
She was particularly critical of strikes by the US Central Intelligence Agency in the northwestern tribal zone of Pakistan which borders Afghanistan, a haven for militants who use it as a base to attack NATO and Pakistani forces.
"The use of drones is causing really serious anger in Pakistan. I really seriously question the necessity for what we are doing," she said.
O'Connell said they could not be justified because there was no open consent from Pakistan, and the strikes could not be taken as an act of war because they did not happen on Afghan soil, where US troops operate.
But Michael Schmitt, an international law professor at Britain's Durham University who spent 20 years in the US air force, told the debate that the strikes were "completely within the law of self defence".
He argued that the drone strikes were a valid measure against a new "transnational" form of combatant, and that they could also be justified if the country where they are based either refused or was unable to act against militants.
The United States has dramatically increased the frequency of drone strikes in Pakistan in 2010, particularly in recent months in response to intelligence claims of plots to launch commando attacks on European cities.
US officials say drone strikes are highly effective in the war against Al-Qaeda and its Islamist allies, but their legality remains shadowy and Washington has never publicly acknowledged the existence of the programme.
Pakistan has condemned the strikes as a breach of national sovereignty.
No comments:
Post a Comment