The South China Sea Crisis: Part of a Much Bigger Problem
07/16/14
Harry J. Kazianis
Defense, South China Sea
Forget
the crisis in Iraq, Syria, or the ongoing situation in Ukraine. While
those issues and parts of the world are clearly important, when we think
about the future of international relations, power politics, or the
flows of trade investment there is no issue of more importance than the
future trends of Sino-U.S. relations. Considering the stakes--like a
$550 Billion bilateral trade relationship, the amount of territorial
claims and counterclaims Beijing has with multiple U.S. allies (who we
would have to go to war for if things got out of control), as well as China’s growing flirtations with a certain neighbor to the north--nothing else really comes close.
The
solution by and large is also known: finding a way to respect a rising
Beijing’s growing interests in the Asia-Pacific and much wider
Indo-Pacific without upending the status-quo or sparking a conflict no
one wants.
The
preferred American option, neatly summarized by Michèle Flournoy and
Ely Ratner for the Center for New American Security, or CNAS, was to
imesh China into the international system. As they explain in a recent Washington Post op-ed:
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-south-china-sea-crisis-part-much-bigger-problem-10890“The current approach has been premised on the idea that China’s integration into the prevailing economic and security order not only is in China’s interest but also benefits the United States and the whole world. Washington has supported China’s accession to leading multilateral institutions, such as the World Trade Organization, and steadily enhanced bilateral relations with Beijing through a panoply of diplomatic engagements, including the annual Strategic and Economic Dialogue that will convene in Beijing in July.”
No comments:
Post a Comment