Pages

Search This Blog

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

House seeks to codify quiet military aid to US-friendly militias

House seeks to codify quiet military aid to US-friendly militias Todd Pierce writes: "I seldom read the nonsense coming out of The American Conservative magazine after they adopted the “West Coast Straussian” practice of concealing all that Trump was doing to wage war (see Mearsheimer) against Russia, and cheering his open aggressions against China, Iran, and Venezuela. I prefer open acknowledgement of our wars, and who promotes them most, to stay informed of our suicidal course of foreign policy/warfighting. This will most likely pass with bi-partisan support but it should be relevant to “non-conservative historians/political” analysts attempting to be “objective” in looking to “causality” of our wars. In other words, who’s inciting/cheering them on the most, and for longest period. Look at any of the Republican Conventions of the last 30 years for the answer to that, though the 2016 Clinton Democratic Coronation was every bit the equal of any Republican insanity. There’s enough pro-war rogues in Congress to satisfy both parties and I can’t do anything about that but at least I can call out the liars and their lies that the “Republicans” have always been and are the “Party of Restraint,” when they never have been, and aren’t today. As Mollie Hemigway and a couple others fallaciously claimed in an odious event on the “New Right” co-sponsored by The American Conservative and Quincy Institute. As this is an on-going “Perception Management/Cognitive War Campaign,” and part of the 2024 POTUS campaign of both Trump and DeSantis, it requires an on-going rebuttal and denunciation. It’s been my experience that those who rely upon TAC now, and for the last 8 years or so, as their primary news source on US Warfighting, are the least informed of US foreign policy as driven by Republicans, and worse, actively convey a fallacious story of it. Such as “Trump ending the endless wars,” when he was accelerating US aggression, doctrinally, and “on the ground,” especially in Ukraine with intensifying USSOCOM operations, as his administration’s officials now boast of"

No comments: