The “Experts” Are Wrong in Advocating Escalation in Syria
06/20/2016
Ivan Eland
Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace & Liberty, The Independent Institute
More than U.S. 50 mid-level diplomats have sent a memo through the
State Department’s “dissent channel” to a likely sympathetic Secretary
of State John Kerry, advocating an American bombing campaign to bring
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to the negotiating table in the bloody
Syrian civil war. The memo concluded, “It is time that the United
States, guided by our strategic interests and moral convictions, lead a
global effort to put an end to this conflict once and for all.”
Because it is even remotely unclear what strategic interests the
United States has in Syria—other than perhaps crippling Islamic State in
Iraq and Syria (ISIS) fighters, who are in opposition to
Assad—President Obama and his military commanders have been reluctant to
get into it with Assad directly, despite much pressure to do so from
inside the government and from congressional hawks. They correctly ask
what would happen if Assad were actually deposed from power by U.S.
military action. Amazingly, the experts’ memo and congressional hawks
have never addressed this question.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ivan-eland/the-experts-are-wrong-in_b_10568192.html
No comments:
Post a Comment