Bullying the Former Warsaw Pact
NATO: a Rebellion in the Ranks?
by JOHN FEFFER
Vladimir
Putin, the wily strategist of Russian revanchism, is well on his way to
reconstructing the Warsaw Pact. That, at least, is what the pundits of The Washington Post are making it out to seem. Last week, Jackson Diehl penned a column on how Putin has driven a wedge between NATO and its easternmost members. Anne Applebaum, meanwhile, pins the failure
to maintain quiet on the eastern front on NATO itself and its decision
not to establish bases in the region 10 years ago. The resulting crisis
of confidence in what were once Soviet satellites, she laments, has
undermined alliance cohesion.These misreadings of what’s taking place on the eastern stretches of Europe contribute to an almost 1946-like sense of foreboding and inevitability. The small countries of Eastern Europe are bending to Moscow’s will, and the West is doing little more than appease the bear. Diehl and Applebaum stop short of declaring a new Iron Curtain and insisting that the region choose sides (over and above membership in NATO). But their all-or-nothing logic tends in that direction.
Contrary to these assertions, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and the rest of the region are not replaying 1946. Although these governments are pursuing very different strategies, they all know that a new Cold War would exact a terrible price on their countries. In most cases, they are quite sensibly trying to forestall this scenario. NATO’s imperative to push ever eastward, which pundits like Applebaum are urging it to do now under the cover of demonstrating resolve, will only make matters worse.
To understand why these pundits are wrong, first it’s important to understand how Russia and NATO arrived at this impasse.http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/31/nato-a-rebellion-in-the-ranks/
No comments:
Post a Comment