 |
From the Blogs
Appeals Court Rejects Reporter's Privilege in Leak Case: In
a new ruling with ominous implications for national security reporting,
an appeals court said on July 19 that there is no reporter’s privilege
that would allow New York Times reporter James Risen to decline to
identify the source of classified information that he revealed in his
book State of War. Mr. Risen had been subpoenaed to testify in the leak
prosecution of former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, who is accused of
leaking information to Risen about a failed CIA operation against
Iran’s nuclear program. Steven Aftergood writes that there is a
permanent tension, if not an irreconcilable conflict, between a free
press and the operations of national security. The tension can be
managed by the exercise of prudent self-restraint on both sides.
Mentors for the Pacific Young Leaders on Disarmament Announced: FAS is pleased to announce that three major diplomatic missions have agreed to provide mentors for the 2013 – 2014 Pacific Young Leaders on Disarmament.
The participating Geneva-based missions include Japan, the United
Kingdom, and the United States. Each of these mentors will provide the
program’s young leaders with first-hand knowledge of WMD policymaking at
the Conference on Disarmament. Their
insider perspectives and expert experience will benefit the young
leaders as they work to draft their own statement to the Conference on
Disarmament for the start of the 2014 Session.
Insider Threat Policy Equates Leakers, Spies, Terrorists: A
national policy on “insider threats” was developed by the Obama
Administration in order to protect against actions by government
employees who would harm the security of the nation. But under the
rubric of insider threats, the policy subsumes the seemingly disparate
acts of spies, terrorists, and those who leak classified
information. One of the implications of aggregating spies, terrorists
and leakers in a single category is that the nation’s spy-hunters and
counterterrorism specialists can now be
trained upon those who are suspected of leaking classified information.
Loose Ends: In
response to an October 2012 presidential directive on “protecting
whistleblowers with access to classified information,” the Department of
Defense and the Department of Energy have produced their implementing
policies. These would generally prohibit retaliation against
individuals who make “protected disclosures” of information to an
authorized recipient.
The Defense Production Act of 1950 and More from CRS: Secrecy News has obtained recently released CRS reports on topics such as the New START treaty, legal issues of fracking and an overview of arms control and nonproliferation treaties.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment