Evil Empire - TomDispatch.com

Evil Empire - TomDispatch.com Best of TomDispatch: Chalmers Johnson, Ending the Empire March 31, 2024 [Note for TomDispatch Readers: Back in 2007, in one of TomDispatch's longest pieces ever, Chalmers Johnson, author of the classic bestseller, Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire, laid out a vision of a distinctly imperial (and increasingly militarized) America as it was then. He saw in that reality (or do I mean irreality?) a crisis of sorts, but also imagined a possible future of "imperial liquidation." He suggested then that "the American people must make the decision to dismantle both the empire that has been created in their name and the huge (still growing) military establishment that undergirds it... de-garrisoning the planet and liquidating our empire." However, he also feared (all too correctly) that "the decision to mount such a campaign of imperial liquidation may already come too late, given the vast and deeply entrenched interests of the military-industrial complex." As it happened, it didn't come at all. If he were alive today, almost 17 years later, I suspect he would be anything but shocked to discover that the Pentagon is now on the way to a trillion-dollar budget, while the full national security state budget passed that point long ago. Nor would he be shocked to find out that the U.S. has done nothing to dismantle its global system of 750 or more military bases or that the Global War on Terror is, in its own grim fashion, ongoing. Now, let me just suggest that you settle in with "Chal" (as he once was called) and consider our all-American world, then and now, including my own 2007 introduction to his piece. And to bother you a little in the process (though Chal would have approved!), let me urge that any of you who would like to see TomDispatch chug on for a while longer consider visiting our donation page and offering a hand. Believe me, it will truly be appreciated! Tom] Way back in 1999, when I was still a Tomdispatch-less book editor, I read a proposal from Chalmers Johnson. He was, then, known mainly as a scholar of modern Japan, though years earlier I had read his brilliant book on Chinese peasant nationalism -- about a period in the 1940s when imperial Japan was carrying out its "3-all" campaigns (kill-all, burn-all, loot-all) in the northern Chinese countryside. The proposal, for a book to be called "Blowback" -- a CIA term of tradecraft that, like most Americans, I had never heard before -- focused on the "unintended consequences" of the Agency's covert activities abroad and the disasters they might someday bring down upon us. Johnson began with an introduction in which he reviewed, among other things, his experiences in the Vietnam War era when, as a professed Cold Warrior, a former CIA consultant, and a professor of Asian studies at Berkeley, he would have been on the other side of the political fence from me. In that introduction, he recalled his dismay with antiwar activists who were, he felt (not incorrectly), often blindly romantic about Asian communism and hadn't bothered to do their homework on the subject. "They were," he wrote, "defining the Vietnamese Communists largely out of their own romantic desires to oppose Washington's policies." He added: "As it turned out, however, they understood far better than I did the impulse of a Robert McNamara, a McGeorge Bundy, or a Walt Rostow. They grasped something essential about the nature of America's imperial role in the world that I had failed to perceive. In retrospect, I wish I had stood with the antiwar protest movement. For all its naivete and unruliness, it was right and American policy wrong." It was a reversal of sentiment to which no other American of his age and background, to the best of my knowledge, had admitted. It reflected a mind impressively willing to reconsider and change -- and, as it happened, it also reflected a man on a journey out of the world of Cold War anti-communism and into the heart of the American empire. When Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire finally came out in 2000, it was largely ignored (or derided) in the mainstream -- until, that is, September 11th, 2001. Then, "blowback," and the phrase that went with it, "unintended consequences," entered our language, thanks to Johnson, and the paperback of the book, now seen as prophetic, hit the 9/11 tables in bookstores across the United States, becoming a bestseller. Johnson's intellectual odyssey had begun when the Cold War ended, when the Soviet Union disappeared and the American imperial structure of bases (and policy) in Asia remained standing, remarkably unchanged and unaffected by that seemingly world-shaking event. An invitation, five years later, to visit the heavily American-garrisoned Japanese island of Okinawa, in turmoil over a case in which two U.S. Marines and a sailor had raped a 12 year-old Okinawan girl, also strongly affected his thinking. There, Johnson saw firsthand what our global baseworld looked like and what it did to others on this planet. ("I was flabbergasted by the 37 American military bases I found on an island smaller than Kauai in the Hawaiian Islands and the enormous pressures it put on the population there. As I began to study it, though, I discovered that Okinawa was not exceptional. It was the norm. It was what you find in all of the American military enclaves around the world.") Now, five and a half years after the 9/11 attacks, Johnson has reached the provisional end of his quest and the single prophetic volume, Blowback, has become "The Blowback Trilogy." In 2004, a second volume, The Sorrows of Empire, arrived, focused on how the American military had garrisoned the globe and how militarism had us in its grip; and finally, this year, a magisterial third and final volume, Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic, appeared. No one should miss it. It lays out in chilling detail the ways in which imperial overstretch imperils the American republic and what's left of our democratic system as well as the American economy. Now, in a step beyond even his latest book, Johnson considers whether we can end our empire before it ends us. Tom