Pages

Search This Blog

Wednesday, February 23, 2022

Blinken-Lavrov Meeting Off As West Pursues Sanctions

Why bother with diplomacy when you can substitute sanctions? Blinken-Lavrov Meeting Off As West Pursues Sanctions Russia’s relations with the West have not quite moved past the point of no return, but are fast approaching it, as the United States and its allies imposed an array of new sanctions following Russia’s recognition of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk republics as independent states. The U.S. sanctions, which target two Russian banks tied to the military and place restrictions on Russia’s sovereign debt, indicate that there are still harsher options available. As FP’s Amy Mackinnon and Mary Yang report, the impact of this initial step is likely to be limited. As well as sanctions, 800 additional U.S. troops, currently in Italy, are to be redeployed to Baltic states, joining 8 F-35 fighter jets on NATO’s eastern borders. As U.S. policy shifts to a more adversarial stance, diplomacy is taking a back seat. A prospective meeting between U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov has been cancelled. “Now that we see the invasion is beginning and Russia has made clear its wholesale rejection of diplomacy, it does not make sense to go forward with that meeting at this time,” Blinken said on Tuesday. Germany, chided earlier this year as a laggard in the NATO alliance, sent its strongest statement yet, following through on a threat to suspend the launch of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. As the possibility of wider war becomes more likely, Romania, a NATO member state bordering Ukraine, has offered to take in more than 500,000 refugees, should the need arise. It joins the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia in preparing for a possible surge in migration. Russia’s reaction. After his angry speech on Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin has provided some clarifications—as well as his own recipe for de-escalation. Speaking alongside Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on Tuesday, Putin outlined the steps he deems necessary to reach a satisfactory resolution: First, international recognition of Russia’s claims to Crimea and Sevastopol. Second, Ukraine voluntarily dropping its plans to join NATO. And third, the “demilitarization of the modern Ukraine,” with the West agreeing to stop weapons transfers to Kyiv. It’s not clear how seriously Western capitals will take Putin’s overture. For Ukraine, future NATO membership is already enshrined in the country’s constitution, making any declaration—even under duress—politically fraught. There’s also the question of Ukraine’s defense ties with NATO allies, particularly Turkey, which may be wary of giving up a valued drone customer. At the same conference, Putin was at pains to emphasize that his actions regarding Ukraine were an exception amongst his post-Soviet neighbors. Citing the apparently swift exit of Russian troops after a brief deployment to Kazakhstan, Putin said the current situation warranted special attention: “It’s different with Ukraine, and it’s related to the fact that, unfortunately, the territory of this country is used by third countries to create threats for the Russian Federation. That’s the only reason.” From the ground. In a dispatch from Avdiivka, in the Ukrainian province of Donetsk, Jack Losh finds a city braced for war. “Of course we’re worried,” a local baker told Losh. “I don’t watch the news—I only need to watch the situation from my window. And it’s been a lot worse lately.”

No comments: