Guantánamo – growing old
Summary: Trump's promises on Guantánamo mercifully not carried out. The Commander worries about the future and is sacked.
In our posting of 5 January 2017 we considered the prospects at the
end of the second Obama administration for the prison at Guantánamo Bay.
Guantánamo was established in 2002 and considered by the George W Bush
and subsequent US administrations to be outside US legal jurisdiction
and therefore not covered by the Geneva conventions, giving the US a
free hand to deal with those suspected of involvement in al-Qa’ida and
other terrorist crimes. That included freedom to use torture although
torture is banned under international law in all circumstances. By 2017
releases and a few deaths had reduced the number of prisoners,
originally nearly 800, to 41. Donald Trump had said during his campaign
that he would keep Guantánamo open and “load it up with some bad dudes.”
He and Mike Pompeo, at that time director of the CIA, had also
reportedly said
that they believed that waterboarding was within the law and was
"absolutely fine… We should go much stronger than waterboarding.’
In January 2018 President Trump signed an executive order keeping the prison
open. In May 2018
one more prisoner was transferred to Saudi Arabia, reducing the number in Guantánamo to 40.
Since then and until recently Guantánamo has largely been out of the
mainstream media. Nothing more has been heard of the commitment to send
more prisoners there, and waterboarding and other gross abuses have not
been resumed. But there has been a great deal of administrative and
legal activity, mainly about individual prisoners. Attempts to bring
some of them to trial have been complicated by various obstacles, often
stemming from the issue of torture, and in the last month this has had
some media coverage. An account of the problems of one troublesome legal
process is at
link and another at
link. A 5 April New York Times report is headed "Guantánamo Trials Grapple With How Much Evidence to Allow About
Torture".
A long, disgusting and very human story of the experiences of another
detainee in the New Yorker is headed "Guantánamo diary and the American
slave
narrative". In some cases complicated legal proceedings have followed
in other countries to which prisoners had been released, for example a
case just concluded in
Canada.
On 27 April the New York Times reported that planning is in hand for
Guantánamo prisoners to grow old and die at Guantánamo (the oldest
prisoner is now 71). Under the Geneva conventions, from which Guantánamo
has after all not completely escaped, the prison is obliged to offer
prisoners
medical care
comparable with that offered to their own staff, who number 1,800; the
staff have access to a military hospital in the US but Guantánamo
prisoners are forbidden by law from entering the US.
The Guantánamo commander, Rear Admiral John Ring, told reporters
about the questions policymakers face. “A lot of my guys are
prediabetic. Am I going to need dialysis down here? I don’t know.
Someone’s got to tell me that. Are we going to do complex cancer care
down here? I don’t know. Someone’s got to tell me that.” Already
prisoners suffer typical middle-aged conditions as well as conditions
arising from torture such as sodomisation. A report in Defence One
further quotes Ring: “ ‘We’re in the early stages of
feeling this out.’
In the coming months, he is sending a team to study how Federal Bureau
of Prisons facilities in the United States handle end-of-life care for
elderly prisoners."
On 28 April April Ring, who had seven more weeks to serve (and had
previously commanded the giant aircraft carrier USS Nimitz), was
fired due to a "loss of confidence in his ability to command," according to the US Southern Command.
No comments:
Post a Comment