Inclusive, expansive disagreement
Last week,
we told you about our vision for more productive events. We believe
that Achieving Disagreement enables us to move past the pre-rehearsed
talking points and toward new, productive starting points. But events
only happen a few times a year, with a limited audience. So how do we
practice dynamic disagreement in every aspect of our work?
We recently started a podcast (Breakthrough Dialogues)
to better engage with ecomodernist influencers. As we navigate the
hyper-polarized politics of the Trump era, we're doing our best to ask
thoughtful questions, conduct inclusive research, and offer productive
platforms. It's part of a larger commitment at Breakthrough to move
beyond the tribalism and polarization that too often characterizes
environmental thought and politics today. By conversing with some of the
leading thinkers on the topics of food, energy, conservation, and
climate — like-minded and not — we hope to shift from problem-
to solution-driven narratives.
It's been such a treat to chat with leaders we admire. We have four
episodes up so far: Charles Mann on human exceptionalism, Jenny Splitter
on the environmental case for feedlots, Jonathan Symons on how to
ethically hack the climate, and Tisha Schuller on how working in the oil
and gas sector pushed her to rethink, and reclaim, environmentalism.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment