Clinton and Trump’s Foreign Policies Share Common Principles
By Tania F. Cohen
From the embers of an election season rife with negativity rises an
unlikely phoenix: reminders of the potential for bipartisanship in U.S.
politics. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton’s proposals for fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and their beliefs
that ISIL presents a greater threat to American security than Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad are strikingly similar. Consequently, they
each prioritize defeating the terrorist organization over a political
transition in Syria. Clinton and Trump also believe
that nuclear weapons are the world’s greatest threat, although their
proposed strategies for fighting that threat differ significantly. The
similarity in their stances—and in the case of fighting ISIL, in their
strategies for accomplishing those objectives—reminds us that
bipartisanship in policy-making, for which establishing common ground
and compromise are key, is possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment