Terrorism Could Never Threaten American Values—the 'War on Terror' Does
It is long past time for Barack Obama to show that he understands this truth.
James Fallows Oct 30 2013 |
It's
an established and obvious point, a corollary to the famous
post-Watergate principle that "it's always the cover-up, never the
crime." The "crime" might initially seem serious, or at least
embarrassing: sending the Watergate burglars to spy on Richard Nixon's
Democratic opponents, whatever happened between Bill Clinton and Paula
Jones or Monica Lewinsky. But of course what came after is what did the
real damage.
So too in the world of terrorism. Attacks can be
terribly destructive, as we saw in hideous form 12 years ago. But the
long-term threat to national interests and values comes from the
response they evoke. In the case of 9/11: The attack was disastrous, but
in every measurable way the rash, foolish, and unjustified decision to
retaliate by invading Iraq hurt America in more lasting ways. I make
that case here, here, here.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/10/terrorism-could-never-threaten-american-values-the-war-on-terror-does/281014/
No comments:
Post a Comment