 |
From the Blogs
Court Eases Prosecutors' Burden of Proof in Leak Cases: In
a new interpretation of the Espionage Act, a federal judge made it
easier for prosecutors in leak cases to meet their burden of proof,
while reducing protections for accused leakers. Judge Colleen
Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the prosecution in the pending case of former
State Department contractor Stephen Kim need not show that the
information he allegedly leaked could damage U.S. national security or
benefit a foreign power, even potentially.
Publishing Secrets is a Crime, OLC Said in 1942:
According to a recently disclosed Office of Legal Council (OFC) opinion
from World War II, newspapers can be held criminally liable for
publishing secret information. A reporter who writes a story based on
defense secrets could be found to have violated the Espionage Act for
revealing secret information, as could his editor and publisher. Under
the authority of the Attorney General, the Office of Legal
Counsel provides authoritative legal advice to the President and to
executive branch agencies. The 1942 OLC
opinion has no binding legal force, and it does not necessarily
represent executive branch views today. But it fills in a gap in the
legal genealogy of leak prosecutions. It also highlights the latent
possibility under the Espionage Act of criminalizing not just leaks but
also news reports based on them.
Keeping it Clean: How
can “cleanliness” can be applied to concepts like warfare and nuclear
weapons testing? For example, the main reason for moving nuclear weapons
underground is because it is a “cleaner” way to test, absent the major
environmental impact of atmospheric testing. In a new post on the
Science Wonk Blog, Dr. Y investigates how sanitizing nuclear weapons
testing has taken from the new and nascent nuclear states the ability to
truly understand what these weapons can do.
DNI Issues New Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement:
Last month, the Director of the National Intelligence issued issued a
revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, also known as
Standard Form 312 or SF 312. It is a binding legal agreement that must
be signed by each of the nearly 5 million people who are cleared for
access to classified information. The revised SF312 includes some
language that did not appear in previous versions of the form. Steven
Aftergood writes that what is perhaps more significant is the fact
that for the first time the new Nondisclosure Agreement was issued by
the Director of National Intelligence rather than the Information
Security Oversight Office, as in the past.
Did Justice Roberts Reshape the FISA Court?: There
have been 71 federal judges who have served on the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of
Review from 1979 until the present. Under the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act, appointments to the Court are made by the Chief
Justice of the United States. An analysis of the Court’s membership by
the New York Times found that during the tenure of Chief Justice John G.
Roberts Jr., a higher number of Republican judges had been appointed
than in the past — 10 of the
current 11 members, compared to 66% under previous Chief Justices.
Marine Corps Commandant Accused of Improper Classification: Marine
Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos exercised “unlawful command influence”
in an attempt to punish Marines who allegedly urinated on enemy corpses
in Afghanistan in 2011, attorneys for the Marine defendants said. And
then Gen. Amos improperly classified information in an effort to conceal
his own misconduct. In 2012, a Marine Corps official warned that the
classification action was a mistake that could backfire against the
Marine Corps if it ever became public.
Military Sexual Assault and More from CRS:
Secrecy News has obtained recently released CRS reports on topics such
as U.S.-China military contacts, military sexual assault, and an
overview on the financial status of the U.S. postal system.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment