Hey China: U.S. is Prepping New Ship-Killing Missiles, Too By Spencer Ackerman

Yeah, yeah, so the Chinese are working hard on a potentially deadly ballistic missile, designed to kill ships. That missile has long prompted a lot of debate about whether surface ships are ultimately a losing proposition for the U.S. Navy. If so, no one’s told the seafarers, who are moving forward with their own anti-ship missile upgrade.
Yesterday, Darpa and the Navy awarded Lockheed Martin $218 million to develop and test an experimental Long Range Anti-Ship Missile, a program to knock out enemy ships using guided missiles even when an adversary (read: China China China) is jamming the Navy’s GPS. The LRASM — “el-razzem” — will come in an air-launched version and a ship-launched one. It’ll use sensors made by BAE Systems to help it select targets autonomously. Lockheed vice president Rick Edwards boasted in a statement that the missiles will provide extraordinary range, willful penetration of ship self defense systems and precise lethality in denied combat environments.”
Exactly how extraordinary that range is remains unclear, making the program rather oddly named. A Lockheed spokesman said the company was hesitant to give out that information without the Navy’s say-so; and the Navy and Darpa are currently conferring to see if the range can be made public. I’ll update when and if I can, but at the very least, the missile will have to travel further than the 150 miles that aging anti-ship missiles like the AGM-84 Harpoon can reach. At least Darpa and the Navy are pinky-swearing that the missile will travel far and wide.

In any event, longer-range anti-ship missiles send a certain message: don’t bother developing a navy that can rival ours. Shipbuilding is expensive, which is one of the reasons the Chinese covet their DF-21D “carrier killer”: it’s a good tool to back a ship way out of your waters. But the People’s Liberation Army Navy is building its own aircraft carrier and expanding its own surface fleet. The U.S. Navy anticipates having the LRASM by 2013 — which essentially adds years onto the timetable for when China’s navy can outperform the U.S.’ No wonder Adm. Gary Roughead, the U.S.’ top naval officer, isn’t out of joint over Chinese seapower.