Pages

Search This Blog

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Terence Corcoran: Is this the end of America?

Terence Corcoran: Is this the end of America?

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/03/19/terence-corcoran-is-this-the-end-of-america.aspx


Posted: March 19, 2009, 7:38 PM by NP Editor
Terence Corcoran, Ben Bernanke, inflation
U.S. law-making is riddled with slapdash, incompetence and gamesmanship

By Terence Corcoran
Helicopter Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve is dropping trillions of fresh paper dollars on the world economy, the President of the United States is cracking jokes on late night comedy shows, his energy minister is threatening a trade war over carbon emissions, his treasury secretary is dithering over a banking reform program amid rising concerns over his competence and a monumentally dysfunctional U.S. Congress is launching another public jihad against corporations and bankers.


As an aghast world — from China to Chicago and Chihuahua — watches, the circus-like U.S. political system seems to be declining into near chaos. Through it all, stock and financial markets are paralyzed. The more the policy regime does, the worse the outlook gets. The multi-ringed spectacle raises a disturbing question in many minds: Is this the end of America?

Probably not, if only because there are good reasons for optimism. The U.S. economy has pulled out of self-destructive political spirals in the past, spurred on by its business class and corporate leaders, the profit-making and market-creating people who rose above the political turmoil to once again lift the world out of financial crisis. It’s happened many times before, except for once, when it took 20 years to rise out of the Great Depression.

Past success, however, is no guarantee of future recovery, especially now when there are daily disasters and new indicators of political breakdown. All developments are not disasters in themselves. The AIG bonus firestorm is a diversion from real issues , but it puts the ghastly political classes who make U.S. law on display for what they are: ageing self-serving demagogues who have spent decades warping the U.S. political system for their own ends. We see the system up close, law-making that is riddled with slapdash, incompetence and gamesmanship.

One test of whether we are witnessing the end of America is how many more times Americans put up with congressional show trials of individual business people and their employees, slandering and vilifying them for their actions and motives. And for how long will they tolerate a President who berates business and corporations as dens of crime and malfeasance? If the majority of Americans come to accept the caricatures of business as true, then America is closer to the end of its life as a global leader, as a champion of markets and individualism.

But America is at risk in other ways, especially in the technical business of setting and executing policy. The presidency of Barack Obama has set out on a course that has no precedent in U.S. history. Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose New Deal transformed the U.S. economy during the Great Depression, pushed America off on a sharply different political and ideological course. The Obama administration is different in many ways, not least in its supreme self-confidence in its methods and objectives.

Reform of health care, environmental policy, education, energy, banking, regulation — every nook and cranny of the U.S. economy has been put on alert for major change. Expansion of government spending, plunging the U.S. into unprecedented deficits, is without parallel. In economic policy, through regulation and control of energy output, financial services and monetary expansion, the U.S. government has embarked on a fundamental reshaping of America. It is designed, in short, to bring on the end of America.

The spillover effect of all this on the rest of the world promises to be dramatically disruptive. The greatest global risk is in monetary and currency policy. Below is a chart that graphically demonstrates the sharp deviation in monetary policy from past norms. Under the chairmanship of Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve is in the midst of a giant economic experiment, flooding the world with U.S. dollars, hoping that flood will stimulate economic activity.

The total monetary base, already at astronomical levels, is now expected to take another big hit with the new Fed policy of buying up U.S. longer-term treasury bills in a bid to drive down long-term interest rates.

Mr. Bernanke is sometimes known as “Helicopter Ben” because he once in an academic paper referred to the use of “helicopters” full of money to rescue an economy from deflation. In comments Wednesday to explain the Fed’s new policy of buying $300-billion in U.S. treasury bills, Mr. Bernanke noted that the Fed is now more worried about inflation being too low than about it getting too high in the future.

For the rest of the world, however, the worry is that America is at risk of becoming the fountainhead of a new inflationary outburst. The U.S. dollar is now in decline, gold is moving sharply higher, and new global currency turmoil is on the horizon.

It may not happen. A paper just published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, source of the chart above, says that the Fed will have to be prepared to absorb all the excess money it has poured into the U.S. economy. It will be a technical and political challenge unlike any central bank has ever undertaken. The future of America is at stake.

1 comment:

Michele Kearney said...

From George Ure at Urban Survival:

I'm Not the Only One To Notice

This being Saturday, with a huge to-do list here at the ranch, my comments will be a bit shorter than weekdays. That said, Terence Corcoran over at the Financial Post this week asked a very difficult question in a column titled "Is this the end of America?" Time was that even asking a question like that would immediately result in being branded as a loonie, nutjob, or subversive, but if you take a look at the US Monetary Base chart that accompanies Corcoran's article, it should become immediately clear to you why I've been a strong advocate of gold, silver, and developing an independent supply of food. Corcoran's got a clear-eyed assessment worth reading.

---

Evidence that America is in the midst of a 'melt-down' is coming more and more into focus it seems, as the financial headlines continue to show that 'things ain't as they should be' here lately:

*

2 corporate credit unions taken over by government
*

Obama budget projected at $9.3 trillion in next 10 years
*

The Congressional Budget Office "Sees FY09 deficit at highest ratio to GDP since 1940s"
*

And "GM, Chrysler May Need More Aid Than Requested, Rattner Says"



Despite the hoopla in most media about the specifics of this development, or that, my personal choice is to step back from it all and look at the longer historical perspective.



As I explained to our premium content subscribers over at www.peoplenomics.com last weekend, the period we're now in is a natural consequence of over-production in a huge number of areas. In Scoville Hamlin's 1930 classic "The Menace of Over Production" the outline of what was then a developing Depression was traced back to over production in a broad spectrum of human endeavors including the bituminous coal industry, oil, textiles, agriculture, and the radio industry to name just a few from the period.



A look around today's economy says that we have experienced a similar "Menace of Over Production" which precipitated the current hard times. These include the over production in the auto industry, over production of Housing, over production of Financial Products, and over production of software and sure, let's throw in the over production of computer networks. Want to throw in over production in the death industry? Sure, what the hell. How many times we can blow up or poison the planet can be expanded infinitely, so why not?



What happens at the moment of inflection or 'waking point' is almost like the climb up to the top of a grand rollercoaster. There's that spot at the very tippy-top where the car almost stops for what seems like an age, you look to the distant horizon, look down.....and then the decline begins. And that first drop was a monster.



The tippy-top moment for the economy which we're suffering through now was the closing days of 1999 when in September of that year I explained in the short paper "Death by Dot Coms: When Barriers to Entry Fail" what would likely follow -- the collapse of the Internet Bubble. From there, trillions of shareholder value began to evaporate in early 2000, the Dow and other indices hit their all-time highs, which have held to this day, if one is conscious enough to consider the purchasing-power equivalent of dollars then versus the inflation-hollowed dollar of 2007 when the Dow hit its nominal all-time high just over 14,000. But it wasn't the high on a purchasing power-adjusted basis.



While it's been hotly debated since 2001 whether the events of September 11th were really an act of terrorism, the longer view of history suggests that 9/11 happened precisely and almost too conveniently at the correct moment to re-energize America's economy, if only for a few years. It spawned a whole new industry (Security/Anti-Terrorism) overnight. It took vast amounts of resource and flipped it over into war-making. Solved an employment problem for young people. It caused some level of inflation and no longer was the country faced with the difficult choices that would have been involved in properly consuming the 'peace dividend' should it have survived. Kiss off balanced budget prospects, again.



Concurrently, an attack of easy money on all front's whipped up a new buying frenzy in Housing and thanks to what's been called the "Enron loophole" we saw massive overbuilding of financial products and a new generation of financial excesses that hadn't been seen since the late 1920's. Rumors have even been bandied bout that one reason Bernie Madoff was treated with such 'kid gloves' was because there may have been more than just private investors used in his operations; there's a question whether governments may have been involved at some level.

http://www.urbansurvival.com/week.htm