Cautioning against ‘letting up,’ Baker extends business closures, stay-at-home advisory to May 18 - The Boston Globe

Cautioning against ‘letting up,’ Baker extends business closures, stay-at-home advisory to May 18 - The Boston Globe: The governor's decision to continue his dual order and advisory, both of which had been slated to expire Monday, surprised few in the business and health communities amid the daily churn of grim coronavirus data.

Northeastern model suggests Boston’s coronavirus outbreak began much earlier than previously thought - The Boston Globe

Northeastern model suggests Boston’s coronavirus outbreak began much earlier than previously thought - The Boston Globe: While the city was still bracing for the pandemic’s arrival, COVID-19 already was spreading undetected, new research suggests.

When Massachusetts goes back to work, it won’t be business as usual - The Boston Globe

When Massachusetts goes back to work, it won’t be business as usual - The Boston Globe: A picture of how working life may change is emerging from interviews with more than a dozen CEOs and other executives planning for the day when the state begins easing coronavirus restrictions.

9 states still prohibit religious gatherings during pandemic. All others have religious exemptions for stay-at-home orders. - TheBlaze

9 states still prohibit religious gatherings during pandemic. All others have religious exemptions for stay-at-home orders. - TheBlaze: The fight isn't over

9 in 10 Americans now worry about the economy collapsing - Axios

9 in 10 Americans now worry about the economy collapsing - Axios: Americans are recalibrating risk and pacing themselves for an open-ended slog.

Fr. Warren's Week Reflection Third Sunday of Easter - Emmaus 4-26-20

Third Sunday of Easter-Emmaus 4-26-20 The appeal of the Emmaus story is that it talks about where most of us live. There are no revelations, no great Saints, no exotic places or people. The Emmaus story is about ordinary everyday despair and Monday-morning drudgery. It is about bumping into a stranger, about sitting down at a table and about sharing a meal. It is about a couple of unknown followers of Jesus who are walking along a dusty road. Their conversation is full of despair, discouragement and disappointment. Life is a burden and does not live up to its promises. Then they meet a stranger. He asks them about their conversation and they recite their woes. In many ways, their conversation could be ours: the everyday stuff, the kids, the economy, world crisis’ all around us like the COVID 19 pandemic, the war, the price of gas or toilet paper, school, job and so on. These are the threads of the daily fabric of our lives. Then the two men go deeper, they say we were hoping for (hoping for what?) for answers to their questions. The same thing we all hope for as we move through life…where is God? Does my life count? Does anything make sense? Why am I so sick? Why this accident or death of a loved one? Why don’t I feel that God is with me? I could put up with anything if I could feel the presence of God; if I only knew that He cared and heard prayers. The Emmaus story picks up on the lives of all of us; we are all on the road of life. Some just beginning their journey while some are in the middle and others near the end. Along the way there are times of joy and times of sadness. We win a few and lose a few. We enjoy the company of family and friends. We despair when bad people win and the good suffer and, like those disciples, we say we were hoping for a God of justice and compassion to make sense of it all. Then suddenly into this mess comes God, the stranger with the holes in His hands who shares food and Himself. That is the point of the story-God is here. He penetrates our everyday life, but we do not always know it. Just as those two disciples, going into Emmaus finally recognized the risen Christ, not in some fabulous Technicolor explosion, but in the simple breaking of the bread…Eucharist moment. They remind us that God is in our lives, although we do not see Him most of the time. The Emmaus story invites us to see God’s love everywhere. Easter moments abound. Let me share with you a true story. A man told me about his son who was in his thirties who was confined to a nursing home. The son had been injured in a car accident several years before and was in a permanent comatose state. The man and his wife would visit at first every day, then twice a week and as the year passed just once a week. “Only because it is our duty as parents.” The man told me “we had stopped loving him.” He said, “Love was reciprocal relationships, giving and receiving and our son could not receive, our son could not give. We went to see him, but as the years dragged on, we stopped loving him.” A whole wall of the young man’s room was glass so that he could be seen at all times from the nursing station. One sunday as the parents arrived they were surprised to see a stranger by his bed. The stranger was a Eucharistic Minister from the local Parish who came every Sunday. But the parents usually visited on a weekday. The Father said, “As we waited outside the room we saw the visitor talking to our son as if they were engaged in a conversation-as if my son could appreciate a conversation.” Then the man took out the Bible and read. By this time, we were in the room and he read the gospel of the day, the road to Emmaus. I thought as he was reading on, “My son cannot hear or appreciate the reading.” Then he prayed a prayer as if my son could appreciate a prayer. Then he continued to give him Holy Communion as if my son could appreciate what he was receiving. Apparently, he did not know my son’s condition. Then as if God had hit me over the head, the Eucharistic Minister does know; but he sees my son differently. Not simply through medical or clinical eyes, but through the eyes of faith. “He treats my son the way he should be treated, as a Child of God.” Then I saw the connection, this Eucharistic Minister was the stranger on the road to Emmaus revealing the presence of God in that hospital room. A God who loves us deliriously, a God who is in our lives and cares about us. However, sometimes it is a matter of practice to be able to discern Him.  I guess that is one good reason why we come to church. To recover our sense of vision, to celebrate the God we have bumped into all week without knowing it. To handle the word and the bread and see this very congregation with the realization that such common everyday stuff harbors the very presence of God.

Yours in Christ, Fr. Bob Warren, SA

www.AtonementFriars.org GRAYMOOR P.O. Box 301, Garrison, NY 10524 For more information call us at 888-720-8247. © 2020

Some School Districts Plan to End the Year Early, Call Remote Learning Too Tough - WSJ

Some School Districts Plan to End the Year Early, Call Remote Learning Too Tough - WSJ: Some districts are giving up on remote learning and ending the academic year early, after discovering that it was too cumbersome for teachers, students and parents.

Coronavirus disease has killed more Americans than Vietnam War - Los Angeles Times

Coronavirus disease has killed more Americans than Vietnam War - Los Angeles Times: Trump has lauded states that have eased restrictions. But as cases reached 1 million in the U.S., several governors extended restrictions.

PA Slams US Remarks on West Bank Annexation, Says Nothing Left to Negotiations | Asharq AL-awsat

PA Slams US Remarks on West Bank Annexation, Says Nothing Left to Negotiations | Asharq AL-awsat: Middle-East Arab News and Opinion - Asharq Al-Awsat is the world’s premier pan-Arab daily newspaper, printed simultaneously each day on four continents in 14 cities

They were waiting for the Big One. Then coronavirus arrived.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/04/15/999514/oregon-preppers-the-big-one-coronavirus-disaster-preparedness/?truid=e6a9a97f971519b8818ba7420a6d576d&utm_source=the_download&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_download.unpaid.engagement&utm_content=04-29-2020#Echobox=1588087990

Stock Market Live Updates and Tracker - The New York Times

Stock Market Live Updates and Tracker - The New York Times: The latest on stock market and business news during the coronavirus outbreak.

All is Not What it Seems in Sweden | The American Conservative

All is Not What it Seems in Sweden | The American Conservative: Contrary to impressions created in American media, the country's approach to the pandemic has not been so 'relaxed.'

Afghans and Americans both deserve better Afghan leadership | TheHill

Afghans and Americans both deserve better Afghan leadership | TheHill: Squabbling between President Ghani and his chief rival, Abdullah Abdullah, has stalled governance and threatens the deal with the Taliban.

Live Coronavirus Cases and Deaths Updates and Tracker - The New York Times

Live Coronavirus Cases and Deaths Updates and Tracker - The New York Times: The U.S. economy shrank at a 4.8 percent annual rate in the first quarter. Officially, more than 53,000 have died, according to The Times’s count, but death rates suggest the true toll is far greater.

Opinion | Who’s Profiting From the Coronavirus Crisis? - The New York Times

Opinion | Who’s Profiting From the Coronavirus Crisis? - The New York Times: Amid an economic catastrophe, a few billionaires are still winning.

How Sweden has faced the coronavirus without a lockdown | Boston.com

How Sweden has faced the coronavirus without a lockdown | Boston.com

IF ISRAEL PROCEEDS WITH ANNEXATION, ITS “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP” WITH THE U.S. AND WITH AMERICAN JEWS MAY COME TO AN END BY ALLAN C. BROWNFELD

This article will appear in the July issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

IF ISRAEL PROCEEDS WITH ANNEXATION, ITS “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP” WITH THE
U.S. AND WITH AMERICAN JEWS MAY COME TO AN END
                                        BY
                         ALLAN C. BROWNFELD
————————————————————————————————————————-
In the recent Israeli election, Prime Minister Netanyahu campaigned aggressively on annexing portions of the occupied West Bank while his opponent, Benny Gantz, opposed unilateral annexation.  Now, with a “unity” government with Netanyahu remaining prime minister, to be followed by  Gantz, The agreement between Netanyahu and Gantz says that annexation should proceed in a way that does not harm Israel’s interests.

The Economist notes that, “Mr. Netanyahu will probably have the final say.  ..Annexation of territory that the Palestinians regard as part of their future state would probably kill any hope of a two-state solution to the Palestinian conflict and could ignite violence.  Mr. Netanyahu will obviously want to avoid that , but he may feel he needs to move before November, when his chum Mr. Trump May be voted out of office.”

The Trump administration has viewed annexation in positive terms. Its attitude toward Israel has been described by U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman as “”an altar of holiness,”. Friedman, an ally of the settler movement and an opponent of creating a Palestinian state, referred to the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem as “a shrine.”  At a ceremony in Jerusalem, he declared that Israel was “on the side of God.”  Israel and the U.S., he said, should grow even closer, which would be a sign of “holiness.”

In a historic reversal of U.S. policy, the Trump administration announced in November 2019 that it does not view Israeli settlements in the West Bank as illegal.  The policy change was announced by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.  He declared:  “The establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not per se inconsistent with international law.”  Prime Minister Netanyahu hailed the change in U.S. policy.  He said:  “this policy reflects an historical truth—-that the Jewish people are not foreign colonialists in Judaea and Samaria.  In fact, we are exiled Jews because we are the people of Judaea.”

The dramatic change in U.S. policy was  challenged by 106 House Democrats in a letter to Pompeo, organized by Rep. Sandy Levin (D-MI), who is Jewish.  They called upon him to “immediately” reverse his position.  The letter was signed by 12 committee chairs, including veteran Reps. John Lewis (D-GA) and Maxine Waters (D-cA).

If Israel proceeds with annexation it may bring to an end its “special relationship” with the U.S. and with the American Jewish community.  It would also challenge the idea that Israel has bipartisan support  and confine its embrace to right-wing Republicans.

For Israel’s right-wing, annexation has long been a key part of its agenda.  This has been the case since the area was captured and occupied by Israel during the 1967 Six Day War.    East Jerusalem was the first part of the West Bank to be annexed following the 1980 Jerusalem Law.  Israeli law has been applied to Jewish settlements throughout the West Bank leading to a system of “enclave law” and claims of “creeping annexation.”  Annexation of the Jordan Valley was first proposed in the 1967 Allon Plan, which was announced in September 2019 by Netanyahu as his plan.   In 2009, Netanyahu endorsed the two-state solution.  But before the April 2019 election  he stated his intention of unilaterally annexing Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

On Sept. 16, 2019, in an interview with Israeli Army Radio, Netanyahu said, “I intend to extend sovereignty on all the settlements and the settlement blocs including sites that have security importance or are important to Israel’s heritage.”  On Sept. 10, 2019, Netanyahu announced his plan to annex the Jordan Valley.  The area to be annexed is about 22% of the West Bank.  He said he had received a green light from the Trump administration .  The next day there was international condemnation of the proposal from Palestinians, the Arab League, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Kingdom, among others.  The U.N. Declared that any Israeli move to impose its administration over the Palestinian territory would “be illegal under international law.”  The EU said there will be a “strong response” if annexation proceeds.

Liberal Zionists emphasize the damage to Israel’s international reputation if annexation takes place.  Israel will become a “pariah” says Americans for Peace Now.  J Street’s Dylan Williams says, “U.S. leaders should make clear that it’d be nearly impossible to maintain the same special relationship with an Israel that abandons a commitment to democracy.”  Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) condemns the annexation plan as the “death-knell of the two-state solution.”

An aide to Sen. Bernie Sanders (Ind.-VT) calls annexation “recklessness that goes against U.S. interest in peace.”  According to the New Israel Fund, “Annexation would be an existential threat to—-and perhaps even a death-knell for Israeli democracy.”  Yair Lapid, the opposition leader in the Knesset, said that if annexation takes place, “...the peace agreement with Jordan will be canceled.  There will be irreversible damage to the relationship with the Democratic National Committee and Jewish communities in the U.S.”

Gael Patir of J Street says that Lapid’s warning that annexation will damage Israel’s relationship to the Democratic Party and American Jewry “is not a notion that is understood in Israel.”  She and Jeremy Ben-Ami, who leads J Street, called for a campaign to convince Israelis that annexation will threaten these most valuable assets.  J Street, its leaders report, is “publicly and privately” urging Joe Biden, whom it has endorsed for President, to “reiterate” and “repackage” his opposition to annexation and to make it clear that he won’t accept annexation as president.  Biden has said that, “Israel, I think, has to stop the threats of annexation and settlement activity” because they will undermine “support for Israel in the U.S., especially among young people of both political parties.”

J Street’s Jeremy Ben-Ami called on right-wing elements of the pro-Israel lobby to speak out against annexation.  in a Zoom briefing, he addressed the question of where AIPAC is on this question:  “For anyone who is watching us who belongs to AIPAC or supports AIPAC , I ask you to ask them.  It is notable, the silence of AIPAC. And many other right-of-center organizations, on the queastion of annexation.—-when they have tried to say through the years that they support two states.”  He said it is time to end a policy of “Israel, right or wrong.”

The Union for Reform Judaism has called on the Israeli government to refrain from unilateral actions that could hinder or thwart  the renewal of the peace process in the short and long term, especially “unilateral annexation.”  In Jeremy Ben-Ami’s view, Democrats might be able to convince Israelis by threatening to rule out any U.S. aid for annexation:  “We not think that the U.S.should foot the bill for anything that has to do with annexation.”  He suggested Israel might lose the “diplomatic immunity” the U.S. provides for its human rights violations at the U.N. and elsewhere if annexation goes through.

Israel promotes itself as a “democracy,” but by Western standards this is hardly the case.  Palestinians in the occupied territories have almost no legal rights.  Palestinians within Israel are second-class citizens.  Israel does not believe in genuine religious freedom, even for Jews.  There is an official state religion and government paid chief rabbis are ultra-Orthodox.  Reform Rabbis cannot perform weddings, conduct funerals or preside over conversions.  There is more religious freedom for Jews in any Western country than in Israel.  There is no such thing as civil marriage.  When a Jew and non-Jew wish to marry, they must leave the country to do so.

In the view of some observers, annexation would simply make clear to the world that Israel is not the kind of Democratic society it proclaims itself to be, and which many Americans of all religions think it is.  Professor Ian Lustick of the University of Pennsylvania, in his new book “Paradigm Lost,”  calls for policy makers to give up the “false belief” in the two-state solution and acknowledge the struggle for equal rights in a one-state reality.  In his view, annexation would create a single state, which already exists.  The effort of those who believe in democracy would then properly turn to calling for equal rights for all of that state’s inhabitants.  The alternative would be apartheid.

In a talk at the Middle East Institute in December 2019, Lustick reports that he was “an avid and early supporter” of the Zionist state for nearly fifty years.  But in the last decade he came to believe that he and other two-state advocates were being misled as Israel took over the West Bank and Jerusalem, “territories no Israeli government will ever withdraw from...Netanyahu has used liberal Zionists to proclaim that a two-state solution is possible, when it is a delusion.  Entertaining that possibility is actually playing a sucker’s game into what the right wants,  which is a constant feeling of that carrot, that maybe we get two states, and meanwhile you send the whole thing into decades and decades and decades of apartheid.”

“what I want in Palestine,”:says Lustick, “is something that Jews and Arabs can live with  and that honors the principles of democracy and equality....The demographic argument is ‘racism’ that goes to the heart of Zionism.  Guess what folks, there are more Arabs than Jews west of the Jordan...Where a state dominates Arabs for the sake of Jews, you are going to subsidize the domination of the country by the clerical right.”

Some have argued for years that Israeli plans for annexation merely publicize the fact that there is only one state in Israel and Palestine, with vastly different rights for Jews and Palestinians and it’s been that way for 50 years.  The struggle should be for equal rights for all the inhabitants of this single state, according to this view.  Former White House side Dennis Ross declared on Twitter, “It’s one state.  Democracy and equal rights for all—-or apartheid.”

Many Israelis, concerned about their country’s treatment of Palestinians, lament its departure from Jewish moral and ethical values.  Prof. David Shulman of the Hebrew University, notes that, “No matter how you look at it, unless our minds have been poisoned by the ideologies of the religious right, the occupation is a crime.  It is first of all based on the permanent disenfranchisement of a huge population...In the end, it is the ongoing moral failure of the country as a whole that is most consequential, most dangerous, most unacceptable. The failure weighs heavily...on our humanity.  We are, so we claim, the children of the prophets.  Once, they say, we were slaves in Egypt.  We know all that can be known about slavery, suffering, prejudice, ghettos, hate, expulsion, exile.  I find it astonishing that we, of all people, have reinvented apartheid in the West Bank.”

If Israel annexes portions of the West Bank it is unlikely to be supported by very many American Jews. Within the Jewish community, Israel and Zionism have become increasingly divisive issues.  In his book, “Trouble In The Tribe:  The American Jewish Conflict Over Israel,” Prof. Dov Waxman of Northeastern University writes:  “A historic change has been taking place in the American Jewish relationship with Israel...Israel is fast becoming a source of division rather than unity for American Jewry...A new era of American Jewish conflict over Israel is replacing the old era of solidarity...This echoes earlier debates about Zionism that occurred before 1948.  Then, as now, there were fierce disagreements among American Jews...Classical Zionism has never had much relevance or appeal to American Jewry.  Indeed, the vast majority of American Jews reject the basic elements of classical Zionism—-that Diaspora Jews live in exile, that Jewish life in Israel is superior to life in the Diaspora...American Jews do not think that they live in exile and they don't regard Israel as their homeland...For many American Jews, America is more than just home, it is itself a kind of Zion, an ‘almost promised land.’  Zionism has never succeeded in winning over the majority of American Jews.”

Since 1948, Israel has been the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance.  Since World War ll, according to the Congressional Service, the U.S. has provided Israel with $233.7 billion, adjusted for inflation.  Israel now receives $3.8 billion annually from the U.S. in military aid.  By annexing portions of the West Bank, Israel would be asking American taxpayers to subsidize an action which is clearly in violation of international law.  It could well bring its “special relationship” with both the U.S. government and with American Jews to an end.

Washington Post-University of Maryland poll finds a problem for Apple-Google coronavirus app

Washington Post-University of Maryland poll finds a problem for Apple-Google coronavirus app - The Washington Post: Nearly 3 in 5 Americans say they are either unable or unwilling to use the infection-alert apps under development by Google and Apple, suggesting a steep climb to win enough adoption of the technology to make it effective against the coronavirus pandemic, a Washington Post-University of Maryland poll finds.

Global coronavirus death toll could be 60% higher than reported |

Global coronavirus death toll could be 60% higher than reported | Free to read | Financial Times: Mortality statistics show 122,000 deaths in excess of normal levels across 14 countries analysed by the FT

The next pandemic could be even worse (Opinion) - CNN:

The next pandemic could be even worse (Opinion) - CNN: Jamie Metzl, Andrew Hessel, and Hansa Bhargava write that the US should adopt the military strategy of not fully demobilizing after a war to fighting pathogens because as bad as Covid-19 is, future pandemics -- including the threat of man-made ones -- could be even worse if we are not prepared.