http://lobelog.com/endless-war-undeclared-and-undebated/#more-32366
Endless War, Undeclared and Undebated
by Mel Gurtov
The death of six US soldiers in Afghanistan on December 21 at the
hands of a Taliban suicide bomber brings to 21 the number of US combat
deaths there in 2015. Once again we must confront the question of
national purpose in waging war without debate or declaration. Like all
other battlefield deaths in the Middle East, the Obama administration
rationalizes these latest as being part of “training, advising, and
assisting,” not combat. But those are merely code words for direct
interventions that Congress has not authorized since 2002, in clear
violation of restrictions the War Powers Resolution of 1973 places on
presidential power.
There will be plenty more casualties in the Middle East for years to
come, and not just because of the seemingly permanent US military
presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. Consider two recent news items.
According
to a plan not yet formally approved,
the Pentagon wants to create a worldwide string of “hubs” as staging
areas for Special Operations forces to strike quickly against
terrorists. Second, most members of Congress
are unwilling to introduce and debate
a bill authorizing the Obama administration’s use of force in the
Middle East and beyond. Thus, there is no end in sight to the US at war,
both because the Pentagon has found the perfect enemy and because no
one in Congress is willing to stand up to it.
The Pentagon’s plan is to have a forward presence that, in the words
of Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, “will enable unilateral crisis
response, counterterror operations, or strikes on high-value targets.”
Not long ago the Pentagon’s mantra was “places, not bases,” so as to
avoid all the political problems, as well as the monetary costs,
associated with a permanent military presence on foreign soil. Now
“places” evidently have been modified to “hubs” and “spokes,”
Pentagon-speak for small-scale leased bases of the sort already in place
all over Africa. Northern Iraq and southern Europe are being considered
as additional hub sites.
Beltway Resistance
Not everyone is reportedly on board with the Pentagon’s plan. The
State Department correctly sees it as a power grab that may actually
harm US foreign policy. The plan works at cross-purposes with diplomacy,
substituting the deployment and use of force for potential
opportunities to engage governments and rival groups. More US military
facilities, no matter their size, invite criticism in the host
countries, may become targets of terror groups, and feed the hostile
propaganda of militants. In our terrorism era, however, State has no
chance to win this battle.
http://lobelog.com/endless-war-undeclared-and-undebated/#more-32366