http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ivan-eland/doing-the-indefensible-de_b_6327266.html
Ivan Eland
Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace & Liberty, The Independent Institute
Doing the Indefensible: Defending Torture
On the news talk shows, everyone is talking about torture --
mostly defending the Bush administration's hysterical actions after the
9/11 attacks. Granted, 9/11 was a searing experience for the general
public, which wanted action in retaliation. However, it is the duty of
wise political leaders to reason with the public to dampen the desire
for any rash, counterproductive actions. Instead, Bush administration
officials used such public fear and anger from 9/11 to fuel public
support for their own unrelated policy agenda that made the Islamist
terrorism problem worse. Torture was one aspect of that policy agenda.
Even after 9/11, terrorism was a rare event, as it was before, and
government terrorism experts should have known that the resources of a
small group, such as al Qaeda, were not great enough to necessitate
excesses in response, such as torture and other government usurpation of
American constitutionally-guaranteed civil liberties.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ivan-eland/doing-the-indefensible-de_b_6327266.html
No comments:
Post a Comment