10/12/14
James Jay Carafano
Foreign Policy, The Presidency, Security, Health, United States
"The
last time a president tried to make a disease a national-security
issue, he helped trigger a global pandemic that killed 50 million
people."
The
White House has declared Ebola to be a top national-security concern.
That ought to worry Americans. The last time a president tried to make a
disease a national-security issue, he helped trigger a global pandemic
that killed 50 million people.
Progressives
like to expropriate the label of national security to help drive their
agendas. Statist, centrally managed, with top-down direction, the
national-security model is the perfect vehicle for any policy “crusade,”
be it fighting global warming or raising taxes. Thus, for example, when
the administration got the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to
label the " debt the biggest threat to national security,"
it had all the cover needed to press for cutting defense and raising
taxes—two cornerstones of President Obama's progressive political
agenda.
But
playing "national security" progressive politics with public health can
bring outright disaster. When the United States entered World War I,
Woodrow Wilson played the national-security card early and often. The
war effort became an excuse for everything from jailing political
opponents to spying on everyday Americans. But, when the president used a
global war as an excuse to preempt sound public-health policy, he
reaped a global catastrophe.
In
1917, the war to end all wars was well under way. At Camp Funston
within the boundaries of Fort Riley, Kansas, sergeants were turning
recruits into doughboys. During their training, the soldiers picked up
backpacks, rifles, helmets—and a new strain of flu.
They carried all these with them as they traveled from the camp to the
railroads, the big cities, the ports and, ultimately, overseas. On every
step of the way to the trenches in Western Europe, they spread the
deadly disease.
When
news of the epidemic reached Washington, the White House decided it was
a national-security problem. The British and French desperately needed
reinforcements to turn the tide of the war; getting our boys over there
was far more important than stopping the spread of the flu over here.
Read full article |
No comments:
Post a Comment