From the Ashes of Iraq: Mesopotamia Rises Again
08/20/14http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-ashes-iraq-mesopotamia-rises-again-11108
Alexander Joffe
History, Politics, Geography, Iraq
"The ancient cauldron returns and decades of warring tribes and dynasties likely await."
The dissolution of the colonial creation named "Iraq"
is now almost complete. Perhaps what comes next is a return to the
past; not a brutal Islamic “caliphate,” but something more basic.
Today, Mesopotamia is reappearing. The term is a Greek word meaning “the land between the two rivers.” The Tigris and Euphrates Rivers
are the defining features, each arising in mountains far to the north
of Baghdad. The rivers and their annual floods defined the landscape,
the cycle of life and the worldview of civilizations. The deserts to the
west and the mountains to the east and far north provided rough
boundaries and were liminal spaces related to the center, but yet
separate and apart, sunbaked and dangerous. Inside Mesopotamia was a
cauldron.
From
the Sumerians of the third millennium BCE through the Assyrian and
Babylonian civilizations of the second and first millennia BCE, to the
Abbasids of the eighth century CE and until the arrival of the British
in the early twentieth century, the space called Mesopotamia
was the container for civilizations that rose and collapsed. Cultures
invented writing and built the first cities, growing and shrinking in
response to changing river courses and global climate. They conquered
and were conquered, traded with surrounding regions, and formed a baggy
but recognizable whole—what we call Mesopotamian civilization.
Internal
distinctions were paramount. Babylonia in the south was dominated by
the rivers and the annual flood, irrigation agriculture and seemingly
unrelenting heat and mud. Assyria in the northern, rain-fed zone sat
amidst undulating plains and foothills. Culturally, Babylonia was older
and more developed, the “heartland of cities” going back to 4000 BCE, a
primacy that Assyria acknowledged even in periods when they dominated
the south. By and large, both shared the same deities and myths, the
same aggressive tendencies, and the same fear and loathing of
surrounding regions. But competition, warfare and repression were
constant.
Read full article
No comments:
Post a Comment