What Has America Learned from Negotiating with Iran?
07/18/14
Flynt Leverett , Hillary Mann Leverett, Seyed Mohammad Marandi
Nonproliferation, Diplomacy, Nuclear Weapons, United States, Iran
And what does Washington still need to learn to close a final nuclear deal?
While negotiators from Iran, the United States and the rest of the P5+1 will not meet their July 20
target for a comprehensive nuclear agreement, it is clear they won’t
walk away from the table in a huff. So, as the parties prepare to
continue the process, what has America learned from negotiating with
Iran, and what does it still need to learn to close a final deal?
One
thing Washington has learned is that the Islamic Republic is deeply
committed to protecting Iran’s independence. Thirty-five years ago,
Iran’s current political order was born of a revolution promising
Iranians to end subordination of their country’s foreign policy to the
dictates of outside powers—especially the United States. Since then, the
Islamic Republic has worked hard to keep that promise—for example, by
defending Iran against a U.S.-backed, eight-year war of aggression by
Saddam Hussein's Iraq and fending off a steady stream of U.S. and
Israeli covert attacks, economic warfare and threats of overt military
action.
On
nuclear matters, the Islamic Republic’s commitment to protecting
Iranian independence focuses on the proposition that Iran has a
sovereign right, recognized in the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty
(NPT), to enrich uranium indigenously under International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) safeguards. The Islamic Republic terminated the purely
weapons-related aspects of the U.S.-supplied nuclear program it
inherited from the last shah, going so far as to reconfigure the Tehran
Research Reactor—which, when transferred by the United States in the
1960s, only ran on fuel enriched to weapons-grade levels (over 90
percent)—to use fuel enriched to just below 20 percent.
But
the Islamic Republic has also been determined to develop a range of
civil nuclear capabilities, including indigenous enrichment for peaceful
purposes. It won’t surrender Iran’s right to do so—even in the face of
massive U.S. and Western pressure and sanctions. Beyond sovereignty and
practical needs, Iranian policy makers judge that appeasing Washington
on the issue will simply lead to more aggressive U.S. demands and
pressure on other disputes.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-has-america-learned-negotiating-iran-10905
No comments:
Post a Comment