Understanding UNRWA
07/17/14
Alexander Joffe, Asaf Romirowsky
UNRWA, Palestinian territories
The Palestinian refugee issue has been around since 1948. UNRWA, the United Nations institution dedicated to their preservation, has been in existence since 1950.
With
the recent re-approval of UNRWA’s mandate for more than three years, it
is worth asking: how long have Western policy makers understood that
UNRWA was a tool for Palestinians and Arab states to perpetuate the
“refugee crisis” and that Palestinians would never accept anything
except repatriation to Israel, an attitude that guarantees hostilities
in perpetuity? The answer is, since the beginning. That is why after
more than sixty years, British diplomatic documents on UNRWA and the
Palestinians are still classified by the Foreign Office.
UNRWA
was established to “carry out in collaboration with local governments
the direct relief and works programmes as recommended by the Economic
Survey Mission.” This mission, under the leadership of former Tennessee
Valley Authority administrator Gordon Clapp, had recommended vocational
training and regional development as the means to facilitate
“reintegration” of Palestinian refugees, either through repatriation to
Israel or resettlement in surrounding countries. Arab states clamored
for regional development aid, hinted repeatedly that they would accept
Palestinians, and throughout the 1950s, billions were poured into aid
schemes that improved their infrastructure. But no Palestinians were
ever resettled.
The game was apparent early on. In May 1952, the Foreign Office received a remarkable report
forwarded by British diplomat Sir Edwin Chapman-Andrews that noted
“Everything has been sacrificed to [UNRWA director John Blandford’s]
lone effort to “sell” the three-year plan to the Arab states—and SYRIA
in particular—while measures which might influence the success of the
negotiations are left undone.”
The
report lamented UNRWA’s lack of educational and vocational training
programs, the lack of a public-relations effort, or any successful
agricultural programs in Jordan. Refugee relief was well-organized, but
anything related to reintegration was subject to “stagnation, waste and
misuse of money and manpower.”
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/understanding-unrwa-10899
No comments:
Post a Comment