The Iraq/ISIS Debate: Beware the Ghosts of Saigon and Karbala
07/10/14
Robert Tollast
Security, History, Iraq
When debating Iraq, the fall of Saigon is as important as the history of Karbala.
Are
we about to witness a “Saigon moment” in Baghdad? Or are we perhaps
witnessing something more comparable to Iraq's February 1991 uprising,
only this time in reverse?
Before addressing those questions, it’s worth considering Heather Marie Stur’s view
that the Vietnam War is a bad comparison for Iraq. Certainly, it is
right that we understand the slippery slope to a quagmire (as Paul
Pillar has argued) but the Vietnam War also has applicable lessons for managing exit strategies.
Stur
is right to suggest however, that the damage inflicted to Iraqi society
by years of sanctions, war, sectarian governance and the shifting
components of Iraqi politics needs to be better understood by policy
makers. Reading about the Montagnards will not help that.
However,
unlike in 1975, the United States has now militarily reentered the
fray. A process has begun of assessing a bloated (and expanding) army
that is moving brigades and even divisions across huge expanses of
terrain, against a comparatively nimble and well-equipped insurgency.
Aside
from the security situation, we also see America’s adversaries sense a
moment of weakness after an unpopular war. After Saigon fell, U.S.
adversaries were quick to exploit America’s setback. At Cam Ranh Bay,
Russia found a perfect home
for the Soviet Pacific Fleet, as well as airfields at Da Nang. Across
the world, insurgents, terrorists and dictators (including Saddam
Hussein) were emboldened.
Read full articlehttp://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-iraq-isis-debate-beware-the-ghosts-saigon-karbala-10840
No comments:
Post a Comment